Blog Archives

#SchoolofTweet (Learning 2.0 Workshop Takeaways)

L2-world-logos-7xI recently had the great opportunity to attend the Learning 2.0 conference in Asia for the fourth time. Since attending the first one in Shanghai, China in 2007 where one of the first activities the conference organizers had attendees do was to sign up for and use Twitter, I’ve greatly benefited from Twitter being an integral part of my PLN. My personal learning has grown immeasurably because of it by bringing me resources and ideas I would have likely not seen and I have a network of experts and colleagues just a tweet away who can help when needed. I wrote about how my PLN has helped to shape me in the past here.

Jumping forward 8 years, I’ve come to see how important social media can be for the personal learning of individuals. For the last few years, I’ve realized how crucial it can be for the learning, branding, and communications needs of a learning institution. Learning doesn’t just happen between the walls of the school anymore

Image licensed from Shutterstock

Image licensed from Shutterstock

and a school’s footprint doesn’t only run through its immediate community. In both of these instances, learning and learning institutions are part of a global landscape, and this is because of technology. Recognizing this is easy, but getting social media like Twitter established into the whole culture of school can be very difficult. Though many schools now have Twitter accounts, not many schools have it embedded in its culture for the combined purposes of learning, branding, and communication. This is why I attended the #schooloftweet workshop at Learning 2.0. I wanted to see how a school got to where they are in its institutional use of social media.

The presenter of the workshop, Tosca Killoran from NIST in Bangkok, Thailand, has been instrumental in getting Twitter off the ground as a branding and communications tool for the school. I won’t summarize the NIST case study since Tosca has already done that on this website, but I’ll just summarize a few takeaways from the session.

Does branding and social media belong in schools? Yes. With so many international schools coming into existence, we can’t sell sameness. We have to show how our school is different in regards to learning from others. We have to make it clear what our mission and values are and what those look like in action. Stating these on a website isn’t enough anymore. We have to tell our story in real-time. How do we tell our story? Social media. This can help promote the essence of who we are and the perception of how people view us from the outside. At the same time, the more consistent we are in using social media for the purposes of branding, learning, and communication, the easier it is to convince people of who we are. Brands have real value, but in the context of international schools, Brands rise and fall with their employees. Establishing a dynamic and consistent use of social media into the culture of the school is critical so that the process and brand lives beyond any individual(s).

So, who does all of this? Tosca said that she took on the school Twitter account to start the process, but confessed that she was doing that for 3-4 hours every evening at home. She also said that was single, so she didn’t have family responsibilities. This isn’t the ideal approach to get started. Getting started is an issue each school will have to tackle since people are already so busy. Over time, once the process had been established more in the culture of the school, the time she had to put into it lessened since other people were sharing the process. To start spreading the use of Twitter, she suggested having some pre-written tweets for teachers with hashtags. She also said the main school account should follow top universities and other international schools since that will grow the school’s presence among these other important institutions. Lastly, she also recommended that school account have a personality. Though not an easy thing to accomplish in 140 characters, it is an essential part of the branding process.

For further detail that nicely supplements the workshop takeaways, discussing the difference between social media IN schools versus social media FOR schools, check out these blog posts here and here.

Screen Shot 2015-10-06 at 1.29.25 PM

Screen Shot 2015-10-07 at 8.27.25 AM

This post is cross-posted here.

Understanding Educational Ideologies that Create Conflict

Image licensed from Shutterstock

Image licensed from Shutterstock

A post on Edutopia called Teacher Collaboration: When Belief Systems Collide came across my path a while back through my Facebook newsfeed. I was very intrigued by this post since it provided nice insight and process to help determine and work through the source of conflict between teaching colleagues. I consider myself a progressive, forward-thinking educator, and there have definitely been times in my career when my educational beliefs and philosophy conflicted with my colleagues. I generally understood the source of the conflict to be this difference in educational philosophy, but this reading and resource helped to understand why and what can be done to use the differences in a proactive way to make meaningful change.

According to the post there six predominant ideologies that shape educational philosophies:

  • Social Reconstructionism
  • Academic Rationalism
  • Technologist
  • Self-Actualization
  • Cognitive Process
  • Religious Orthodoxy

You can see the specific descriptions for these in the original post or in the image below where you can see how I ranked my self on the document they provide in the post.

Six Belief Systems GalvezAfter reading the description of each ideology, it became very clear with which ones I most highly aligned.

  1. Self-Actualization
  2. Cognitive Process
  3. Social Reconstructionism

You can see how my top ranked ideologies are practiced in past posts I’ve written about my classes:

Because of working in international schools, I don’t really interact with people who would highly rank Religious Orthodoxy. Looking at this, I think most conflict that I’ve experienced has been with those that would highly rank Academic Rationalism.

Are any of these ideologies better than the other? With the question worded that way, I would say no. They all work well in certain contexts. Are any of these ideologies more relevant in today’s world? With this question, I would say that no one ideology is more relevant, but I would say that a combination of them is more relevant. As you can imagine, I would argue that the combination of my top three choices would be most relevant, when considering the needs for success in today’s world.

In the end, I think a common goal for all teachers is to have their students learn and become better and more thoughtful people through the educational process. What we think of as “better” and “more thoughtful” might vary, but as long as we put education at the forefront of society,  we can and will be successful together in achieving this common goal.

%d bloggers like this: